Chapter two discusses that there is a real need for change in not only the interaction between students and teachers, but school itself. The design of high schools has been the way it is since before any of us have been alive. There has been so much change in the world, and yet schools are still the same as they are when I was in school and my parents, too. Heck, even my grandparents. I am so much different then my grandparents, and my students are so much different than my parents. Technology has had so many advances, that it is crazy to think that they way my parents were taught Algebra is basically the same way I taught my students last year, aside from calculators. The chapter describes that we are not meeting the needs of our students in the public system. That is why so many charter and magnet schools have developed. Schools must offer more choice when it comes to what is being taught and how it is being taught. School design must also change. There is constant change occurring, and schools are stagnant. Schools are built to last--which is understandable, but when instruction is ever changing, who knows what shape schools will need to be in the next 10 years. If classrooms were more malleable then different types of instruction could occur. I foresee the first transition to this is movable furniture at least.
In my classroom I received a 21st century classroom grant. The majority of this grant provided technology, but I also got new classroom furniture. I had tables and chairs with wheels. That was awesome because when students were grouping or moving, then they were comfortable. They weren’t dragging self contained desks across the room. They weren’t awkwardly sitting with uneven surfaces to write on. That small change made collaboration easier and more comfortable. That’s what schools need, and students want. This chapter also discusses that change is always met by resistance. People get comfortable where they are, and they don’t want to do a drastic change because there is so much that is unknown. A favorite response of mine when I go out to talk to teachers about change is, “I did it this way, and look at me. I’m successful!” And I agree to a point. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. But I, and many others will argue that it is broken. Students aren’t the same as they once were. I am different that my colleagues, and I do things differently. It doesn’t make either one of us right, but It shows that there is gap in age as well as how things are done. I am far from an ideal teacher, but as research, and this chapter, says, I am newer to the profession so I am not as set in my ways. I believe that students need to speak more and interact more. I know they can research and come to conclusions with little help from me. I am also scared about the transition though. There are so many variables that must be taken into consideration when it comes to this transition, and all the weight feels like it falls on the teachers. People need to get on board and be on the same page before a huge transition can occur, and that is the current struggle.
1. I agree that it is broke: just look at our test scores, graduation rates, and pass rates...
ReplyDelete2. I am very interested in your 21st century grant and how you used it. You saw the two things that you needed to make your classroom more productive. Of course technology is needed for the 21st century so students can learn on items they will use in the real world (as they are much closer to the real world in high school and might actually use the same technology before it is outdated) but you also acknowledged that the way that the classroom is set up must be changed. I love the idea of the moveable classroom - no more rows of desks where you are called out for moving the desks and making noise and possibly forgot to move them back afterwards. You see that with technology we need to get up and move. That is why we have laptops and ipads because today's generation does not sit and work, they move and collaborate. Have you noticed an increase in scores and understanding by adding these things to your classroom? Do the students enjoy Math (?) more now that they have a classroom that is not boring and traditional?
I think some people have given up.. and just accept that status quo... its not always about the age.. sometimes its about the mindset..
ReplyDeleteI wonder how you could identify if a teacher has given up? I wonder what could be done to see if they were ready for change or not? Do you have any ideas?
Katie, the grant was awesome, but I had very little training on how it would work in a math classroom. The same technology was given to one teacher in every high school of our district, but we all taught different things, so it was hard to collaborate and discuss what worked for each of us. I used the computers to have the students research real world problems and solve them and also to make presentations. it worked well, but I needed more time to use the technology more effectively. The students loved using the computers and being able to see math in the real world. I used the technology predominantly with my seniors, so they didn't have any standardized tests. I think the kid's motivation was enhanced though.
ReplyDeleteDr. Cullen, I totally agree that it doesn't have to do with age all the time, but the most common reluctance comes from veteran teachers. I think if there was good support at the school, and models of good integration then teachers would be more open to it. Also, teachers are overwhelmed with the different types of technology around and what is good and how to use it properly. If someone gave teachers one or two programs, ideas, or strategies to use a month then I think the transition would be more effective. It needs to be easy enough for them to just use, with little change or preparation. Getting teachers from 0-IVA on the CBAM Behaviors levels would be quick. Teachers also need to be held accountable for it. I know the TLE model of teacher evaluation has a section for technology, but giving teachers the opportunity to show their use of technology before they are being evaluated on it would be beneficial.